Malaysia RTAEnglish|Bahasa
Login
Username

Password



Forgot your password?

Not a member? Register online!
Reports
Project-Based Approach Incorporating ICT Component And Soft Skills

Implementation of PBL for Mathematics Year 3 Pupils

Learning To Integrate ICT With Intel Teach

MOE‐Intel School Adoption Project Phase I
Counter
You are visitor number
154560
since Feb 01, 2007
 

Events

2010 Events:

MF Training in IPGs/Universities:

1. IPGM Kampus TAA, 11-15 January 10 - 20 participants - TwT
2. IPGM Kampus RM 10 participants -TwT
3. IPGM Kampus SAH, 5 participants - TwT

2009 Events:

MF Training in IPGs/Universities:

1. IPKeningau, 12-16 January 09 - 20 participants (IPKS, IPGaya, IPTS, IPKent)
2. IPTI, 10-13 March 24 participants (IPTI, IPTHO)
3. IPPPP, 23-27 March 24 participants (venue in Regency Hotel, Alor Setar for IPPPP, IPPP, IPDA, IPSAH, IPTB, IPIP)
4. IPT, 6-10 April 2009 18 participants (IPT, IPBMM, IPIK, IPRM, IPBA)
5. IPSM, 20-24 April 2009 24 participants (venue in Kolej Datu Tunku Hj Bujang, Miri for IPSM, IPR, IPBL, IPTAR)
6. IPSMB, 3-7 May 2009 24 participants (IPSMB, IPKT, IPTAA, IPKB)
7. IPBL, 18-22 May 2009 20 participants (Venue in Sibu IPBL, IPTAR, IPR, IPSM) - TEO
8. ELTC, 20-24 May 2009 24 participants (TEO)
9. IPPM, 6-10 July 2009 16 participants (TEO)
10. UMS, 17-21 August 2009 - 20 participants
11. ELTC, 20-24 July 2009 - 24 participants (TEO)


MF/PT Training in schools:

1. Kolej Datu Tunku Hj Bujang, Miri, 13-16 March 09 - 20 participants
2. Kolej Matrikulasi Kuantan, 25 Feb - 1 March 09 - 20 participants
3.
SK Putrajaya P9(1), 25, 28 Feb, 2,3,4,6,19,11,13 March 2009 - 20 participants
4. SMJK Confucian, KL, 30 May - 2 June 09 - 30 participants

5. SMJK Sam Tet, Ipoh 30 May onward, 129 participants
6. SMJK Perempuan Perak, Ipoh, 20 June onward, 83 participants



Number of teachers attended Intel Teach training 2000-2008:

Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 TOTAL
Inservice 395 6326 6852 1445 1802 1169 1475 1750 1020 22234
Preservice 0 0 1622 4551 4408 406 5100 4977 7247 28311
Total (I+P) 395 6326 8474 5996 6210 1575 6575 6727 8267 50545
2008 Events:

Event Date Venue Remarks
WCIT 19-21 May 08 KLCC Live Classroom
Unit Portfolio Contest 2008 17-18 Oct 08 Hotel Pearl International, KL 2 Categories:
Pre-Service &
In-Service

Pilot Intel Teach Essentials Version 10:

1. 29 oct - 2 November 2007 in BTPN, Port Dickson for teachers(MF) from 10 Pilot Schools

Intel Teach Essentials Version 10: New

1. 15 Jan - 22 May 2008 in 13 IPGs for lecturers from 28 IPGs.

Pilot Teaching Essentials Online: New

1. August 2008 in ELTC

2. Oct 2008 in IPPM

Pilot Thinking With Technology: New

 1. October 2008 - Postponed to Q3 2009

 

All Intel® Teach Master Facilitators (MFs) and/or Participant Teachers (PTs) are eligible to submit curriculum-aligned, technology supported and project-based unit portfolio (version 10) in the 2008 Unit Portfolio Contest. MOE is collaborating with Intel Education to hold the contest annually.

 

  Eligibility of Entry

·         There will be two categories for the contest:

Category

Level              Remarks

BPG/IPG

MF

BPG/IPG Lecturer/Staff

PT

IPG Course Participant – KPLI, PISMP, KDP

 

BTP/School

 

MF/PT

 

Intel’s pilot schools

·         *Entries are limited to 1-3 MFs (individual or group) and/or PTs per unit portfolio and must be original.

·         Entries must be submitted in a CD.

·         Entry Forms and Entries must be postmarked by 10 October 2008.

·         Intel or associates of Intel, reserve the rights to modify and/or reproduce the product in print, online, or in any other media without compensation.

 

* Each IPG is allowed to submit 3 - 5 entries for each level

gg

  Guidelines

The unit portfolio should consist of the following important components in their respective folders as shown in the diagram.

 

·         Unit Plan

 

o    Use the Version 10 Unit Plan Template

·         Student Sample

o    Prepare at least one student sample

·         Assessments

o    Show a variety of methods to assess students’ content learning, 21st century skills and higher-order thinking

·         Unit Support

o    Show the use of technology to support the unit and facilitate the student-centred classroom

·         Resources

o    List all resources (images, sounds, books, journals, URL etc) in accordance with  copyright law and Fair Use guidelines

gg

  Evaluation Scheme

The Unit Portfolio is judged based on the following criteria

·         Learning Objectives/Learning Outcomes…………….....…………………………………..…………………..3

o    The topics covered clearly align with MOE Curriculum Guidelines/ Syllabus

o    The learning objectives are based on the MOE Curriculum Guidelines/ Syllabus

o    The learning objectives clearly promote Higher Order Thinking Skills and 21st Century Skills

·         Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)………………………………………………………………..............…..4

o    Create Curriculum Framing Questions and activities that encourage students to use Higher Order Thinking Skills. The questions are open-ended, encourage in-depth discussion and research, and set the stage for further questioning 

·         21st Century Skills……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3

o    The portfolio shows evidence that teacher has provided instruction, modelling and multiple opportunities for students to refine and develop relevant 21st Century Skills (Information and Communication Skills; Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills; Interpersonal and Self-Directional Skills)

·         Project Based Learning………………………………………………………………………………………………………….5

o    Evidence of Project Based Learning methodology has been adopted by teacher for the completion of the portfolio

o    Project Based Ideas (Goal, Role, Audience, Set of tasks and solutions, Products, Assessment/Evaluation) have been applied in the portfolio, engage students as stakeholders, involve students in problem-investigation and other meaningful tasks, allow students to build their own knowledge by answering essential questions and conclude with realistic products

o    The portfolio is designed across multiple disciplines

·         Instructional Procedures…………………………………….………………………………………………………………..5

o    Procedures of the portfolio are clearly stated.

o    The teacher has planned and implemented activities that

§  engage students with Higher Order Thinking Skills and 21st Century Skills

§  promote effective use of technology

§  students can make real life connection to develop realistic end products 

·         Differentiation of Instruction……………………………………………………………………………………………….2

      o    Accommodations to support diverse learners are clearly stated

·         Technology Integration………………….…………………………………………………………………………………….6

o    Proposed Technology use is engaging, age appropriate, beneficial to student learning, and supportive of Higher Order thinking Skills

o    Technology is integral to the success of portfolio

o    A clear relationship between the use of technology and student learning is exhibited by the student samples

o    Use of technology enhances the portfolio by using the computer as a research tool, a publishing tool,  a collaboration tool and a communication device

·         Implementation……….………………………………………………………………………………………………………...3

o    Unit plan has a well thought-out, detailed instructions and procedures that make the unit easy to implement

o    Portfolio components are well-developed models for project implementation

·         Student Samples (Presentation/Publication/Web-based Resource: Wiki/Blog)……..6

o    The teacher has developed student samples that

§  achieve targeted learning outcomes, 21st Century Skills and Higher Order Thinking Skills

§  address the Curriculum Framing Questions in a meaningful and insightful ways

§  show authentic, meaningful and representative of the kinds of work people do in real life

·         Provision of Scaffolds………….…………………………………………………………………………………………….2

o    The teacher has prepared scaffolds that

§  support students learning

§  encourage students to work independently

·         Assessment……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6

o    A variety of assessments that are student-centred, ongoing and provide valid and reliable information for teaching and learning

o    Assessment clearly and thoroughly address all targeted curriculum specifications and learning

·         Copyright / Citation…………………………………………………………………………………………………………5

o    The teacher has acknowledged all the materials used in the portfolio

o    The teacher has ensured that copyright law and Fair Use guidelines are followed

 

  Judging

·         There will be a panel of judges for this contest. The judges’ decisions are final.

 

  Awards

·         The prizes listed below are for each category:

 

First Place

Cash RM1,000

Mini Laptop Computer

Souvenir from Intel and MOE

Certificate

*Souvenir for facilitator (if any) 

Second Place

Cash RM800

Souvenir from Intel and MOE

Certificate

*Souvenir for facilitator (if any)

Third Place

Cash RM500

Souvenir from Intel and MOE

Certificate

*Souvenir for facilitator (if any)

Consolation

Souvenir from Intel and MOE

Certificate

*10 for BPG/IPG

*5 for BTP/School

 

 

Click here to download the Contest details.

 2007 Unit Portfolio Contest Winners!

 

BPG/IPG - MF

BPG/IPG – PT

BTP/School – MF/PT

First Place: Farm Choon Moy & Poon Cheng Yong

The Magic of GSP

Institut Perguruan Sarawak Miri, Sarawak

First Place: Ismadi Ghazali & Darussalam Abd Rahman & Aina Dayana bt Himi

Awas

Institut Perguruan Ilmu Khas, WP

 

First Place: Harnida bt Mohd. Noh

Come Rain or Shine

SK Ayer Keroh, Melaka

Second Place: Yeow Kek Ong

Usahawan

Institut Perguruan Perempuan Melayu, Melaka

Second Place: Nicholas Ling Neng Ching & Muhammad Hazwan Kayun & Nurul Hani Johari

Water Pollution

Institut Perguruan Bahasa-Bahasa Antarabangsa, WP

 

Second Place: Mazni Anita bt Awang

Garden Treasures

SMK Padang Midin, Terengganu

Third Place: Mohd. Nordin Abdullah & Abd Ghaffar Jaffar

Geometry and life

Institut Perguruan Tuanku Ampuan Afzan, Pahang

Third Place: Hoo Meow Lin & Nurul Ashikin Amiruddin & Tee Chu Suan & Umi Hani bt Mastubi@Marzuki

Lebih Atau Kurang

Institut Perguruan Perempuan Melayu, Melaka

 

Third Place: Norhayati bt Mat Zain

Perjuangan Rakyat Tempatan Mengembalikan Kedaulatan Bangsa

SMK Seri Permaisuri, WP

 

 

 

Photo
What's New

Survey Kursus Intel Teach - BPG

Klik sini untuk memberi maklumbalas selepas menghadiri kursus 5 hari.


Survey Kursus Intel Teach - Project Based Approaches (facilitated)

Klik sini untuk memberi maklumbalas selepas menghadiri kursus 2/3 hari.


The Overall Best Winners of 2009 Unit Portfolio Contest are from:

  • Kolej Datu Tunku Hj Bujang, Miri
  • IPGM Kampus Bahasa Antarabangsa, KL
  • IPGM Kampus Perempuan Melayu, Melaka




Project Based Approaches (PBA)

Participants may take the course from a CD or online; self-paced or facilitated. By the end of the course, participants who complete the Action Plan will have designed materials and activities to implement or improve project-based approaches in their classrooms. Complete and submit the Action Plan to qualify for the Certificate of Completion. Send your Action Plan via email or mail it to 123, Persiaran 155A, Bukit OUG Townhouse, 58200 Kuala Lumpur.

Call 0126390536 or email yk_yap@anyconnection.com to order your PBA CD.

 
 


ST and MF are encouraged to try the following sites for more information on:

1. Help Guide : http://www.intel.com/education/helpguide/ms-my/index.htm

2. Setting up wiki and blog - http://engage.intel.com/groups/asia-st-summit

3. Thinking with Technology-   http://educate.intel.com/education/teach/workshops/index.asp



Please login as ST or MF to    
  1. download
    • Manuals for Intel® Teach Essentials Course v.10
    • Guidelines/Manuals for Web 2.0
      • Blogging with 21classroom, Wordpress, Blogger & Wikispaces
    • Training Forms (ST & MF)
  2. view sample Unit Plans

Pre-Service and In-Service Training Schedule 2009 [ more ]


Useful Links
Resources, ideas and inspiration for all teachers!

Designing Effective Projects

Assessing Projects

The Partnership for 21st Century Skills

PBA element

Wordle
Success Stories
Case Study of IPPM

Case Study of ELTC

Case Study of IPIK - 1
Case Study of IPIK - 2

Case Study of School
Privacy Policy|Disclaimer|Site Map|Contact Us About Intel|About Intel® Teach Program